🔗 Share this article

Opponents have charged Germany’s leader, Friedrich Merz, of using so-called “dangerous” discourse about immigration, following he advocated for “massive” deportations of people from cities – and asserted that those who have daughters would agree with his position.

Defiant Stance

Friedrich Merz, who became chancellor in May promising to combat the growth of the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland party, this week reprimanded a journalist who asked whether he wanted to retract his hardline comments on immigration from recently considering broad disapproval, or say sorry for them.

“It is unclear if you have offspring, and daughters among them,” Merz said to the correspondent. “Consult your girls, I expect you’ll get a very direct response. I have nothing to withdraw; on the contrary I emphasize: we have to modify something.”

Political Reaction

The left-leaning opposition alleged that Merz of emulating far-right organizations, whose allegations that female individuals are being singled out by immigrants with abuse has become a global far-right rallying cry.

Green party politician Ricarda Lang, criticized the chancellor of delivering a condescending message for girls that overlooked their real policy priorities.

“Perhaps ‘the daughters’ are also displeased with Friedrich Merz showing concern about their entitlements and security when he can use them to defend his totally backward-looking strategies?” she wrote on social media.

Public Safety Emphasis

Friedrich Merz stated his priority was “security in public space” and emphasized that only if it could be ensured “would the conventional groups restore faith”.

He had drawn flak last week for statements that commentators alleged implied that diversity itself was a challenge in the nation’s metropolitan areas: “Certainly we still have this issue in the city environment, and that is why the federal interior minister is now working to allow and carry out removals on a massive scale,” Merz said during a visit to the state of Brandenburg outside Berlin.

Discrimination Allegations

Green politician Clemens Rostock alleged that Merz of stoking ethnic bias with his comment, which sparked small protests in multiple urban centers at the weekend.

“This is concerning when governing parties try to label people as a problem according to their appearance or background,” Rostock said.

Natalie Pawlik of the Social Democrats, coalition partners in the ruling coalition, stated: “Immigration should not be labeled negatively with reductive or demagogic kneejerk reactions – this divides the community to a greater extent and ultimately assists the undesirable elements as opposed to fostering resolutions.”

Electoral Background

The chancellor’s political alliance recorded a disappointing 28.5 percent performance in the February general election compared to the anti-migrant, anti-Islam Alternative für Deutschland with its record 20.8%.

Since then, the extremist party has pulled level with the Christian Democrats, exceeding their support in some polls, amid voter fears around immigration, criminal activity and economic slowdown.

Previous Positions

The chancellor rose to the top of his party pledging a stricter approach on migration than the longtime CDU chancellor the former head of government, dismissing her “we can do it” slogan from the asylum seeker situation a ten years past and giving her part of the blame for the growth of the far-right party.

He has fostered an at times increasingly popularist rhetoric than Merkel, infamously blaming “young pashas” for recurrent vandalism on New Year’s Eve and refugees for taking oral health consultations at the cost of German citizens.

Electoral Preparations

Merz’s party gathered on recent days to develop a strategy ahead of multiple regional votes in the coming year. Alternative für Deutschland maintains strong leads in two eastern regions, nearing a record 40 percent approval.

The chancellor maintained that his organization was aligned in preventing cooperation in governance with the far-right party, a policy commonly referred to as the “barrier”.

Internal Criticism

However, the recent poll data has alarmed various Christian Democrats, causing a few of organization representatives and advisers to propose in recent weeks that the firewall could be impractical and harmful in the future.

Those disagreeing argue that provided that the AfD established twelve years ago, which national intelligence agencies have labelled as far-right, is able to comment without accountability without having to implement the hard choices administration necessitates, it will gain from the ruling party challenge afflicting many western democracies.

Academic Analysis

Academics in the nation have determined that established political groups such as the Christian Democrats were increasingly allowing the extremist to set the agenda, unintentionally legitimising their proposals and disseminating them further.

Although the chancellor resisted using the phrase “protection” on this week, he maintained there were “basic distinctions” with the AfD which would make cooperation impossible.

“We recognize this challenge,” he stated. “We will now additionally demonstrate clearly and very explicit the far-right party’s beliefs. We will separate ourselves explicitly and directly from them. {Above all